Up to standard? A critique of IPSO's Editors' Code of Practice and IMPRESS' Standards Code (Part 1)

Carney, Damian ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7892-054X 2017. Up to standard? A critique of IPSO's Editors' Code of Practice and IMPRESS' Standards Code (Part 1). Tottels Communications Law 22 (3) , pp. 77-88.

Preview

PDF - Accepted Post-Print Version Download (499kB) | Preview

Abstract

This, the first part of a two-part article, compares and contrasts the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) Editors' Code and the Independent Monitor of the Press (IMPRESS) Standards Code to identify their strengths and weaknesses, and whether they are 'fit for purpose'.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Journalism, Media and Culture
Publisher:	Tottel Publishing
ISSN:	1746-7616
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	24 October 2017
Date of Acceptance:	11 September 2017
Last Modified:	30 Nov 2024 14:30
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/105913

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item