Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Simultaneous comparisons of treatments at multiple time points: Combined marginal models versus joint modeling

Pallmann, Philip, Pretorius, Mias and Ritz, Christian 2017. Simultaneous comparisons of treatments at multiple time points: Combined marginal models versus joint modeling. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 26 (6) , pp. 2633-2648. 10.1177/0962280215603743

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

We discuss several aspects of multiple inference in longitudinal settings, focusing on many-to-one and all-pairwise comparisons of (a) treatment groups simultaneously at several points in time, or (b) time points simultaneously for several treatments. We assume a continuous endpoint that is measured repeatedly over time and contrast two basic modeling strategies: fitting a joint model across all occasions (with random effects and/or some residual covariance structure to account for heteroscedasticity and serial dependence), and a novel approach combining a set of simple marginal, i.e. occasion-specific models. Upon parameter and covariance estimation with either modeling approach, we employ a variant of multiple contrast tests that acknowledges correlation between time points and test statistics. This method provides simultaneous confidence intervals and adjusted p-values for elementary hypotheses as well as a global test decision. We compare via simulation the powers of multiple contrast tests based on a joint model and multiple marginal models, respectively, and quantify the benefit of incorporating longitudinal correlation, i.e. the advantage over Bonferroni. Practical application is illustrated with data from a clinical trial on bradykinin receptor antagonism.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Medicine
Publisher: SAGE
ISSN: 0962-2802
Last Modified: 08 Jun 2020 15:15
URI: http://orca.cf.ac.uk/id/eprint/106175

Citation Data

Cited 4 times in Google Scholar. View in Google Scholar

Cited 2 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item