Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Criticism and blame in action and assertion

Simionescu, Mona and Kelp, C. 2017. Criticism and blame in action and assertion. Journal of Philosophy 114 (2) , pp. 76-93. 10.5840/jphil201711426
Item availability restricted.

[img] PDF - Accepted Post-Print Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (181kB)

Abstract

In this paper, we develop a general normative framework for criticisability, blamelessness and blameworthiness in action. We then turn to the debate on norms of assertion. We show that an application of this framework enables champions of the so-called knowledge rule of assertion to offer a theoretically motivated response to a number of putative counterexamples in terms of blamelessness. Finally, we argue that, on closer inspection, the putative counterexamples serve to confirm the knowledge rule and disconfirm rival views.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: English, Communication and Philosophy
Publisher: Journal of Philosophy
ISSN: 0022-362X
Date of First Compliant Deposit: 23 February 2018
Last Modified: 18 Jul 2019 14:37
URI: http://orca.cf.ac.uk/id/eprint/106619

Citation Data

Cited 4 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics