Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

A new way to look at the data: similarities between groups of people are large and important

Hanel, Paul H. P., Maio, Gregory R. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5408-5829 and Manstead, Antony S. R. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7540-2096 2019. A new way to look at the data: similarities between groups of people are large and important. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 116 (4) , pp. 541-562. 10.1037/pspi0000154

[thumbnail of Manstead. A new way to look. pub.pdf] PDF - Published Version
Download (2MB)
[thumbnail of Manstead. A new way to look. pub.pdf]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

Most published research focuses on describing differences, while neglecting similarities that are arguably at least as interesting and important. In Study 1, we modified and extended prior procedures for describing similarities and demonstrate the importance of this exercise by examining similarities between groups on 22 social variables (e.g., moral attitudes, human values, and trust) within 6 commonly used social categories: gender, age, education, income, nation of residence, and religious denomination (N = 86,272). On average, the amount of similarity between 2 groups (e.g., high vs. low educated or different countries) was greater than 90%. Even large effect sizes revealed more similarities than differences between groups. Studies 2–5 demonstrated the importance of presenting information about similarity in research reports. Compared with the typical presentation of differences (e.g., barplots with confidence intervals), similarity information led to more accurate lay perceptions and to more positive attitudes toward an outgroup. Barplots with a restricted y-axis led to a gross underestimation of similarities (i.e., a gross overestimation of the differences), and information about similarities was rated as more comprehensible. Overall, the presentation of similarity information achieves more balanced scientific communication and may help address the file drawer problem.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Psychology
Publisher: American Psychological Association
ISSN: 0022-3514
Date of First Compliant Deposit: 3 July 2018
Date of Acceptance: 2 July 2018
Last Modified: 11 Oct 2023 20:05
URI: https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/112948

Citation Data

Cited 39 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics