Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Measuring category intuitiveness in unconstrained categorization tasks

Pothos, Emmanuel M., Perlman, Amotz, Bailey, Todd M., Kurtz, Ken, Edwards, Darren J., Hines, Peter and McDonnell, John V. 2011. Measuring category intuitiveness in unconstrained categorization tasks. Cognition 121 (1) , pp. 83-100. 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.06.002

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

What makes a category seem natural or intuitive? In this paper, an unsupervised categorization task was employed to examine observer agreement concerning the categorization of nine different stimulus sets. The stimulus sets were designed to capture different intuitions about classification structure. The main empirical index of category intuitiveness was the frequency of the preferred classification, for different stimulus sets. With 169 participants, and a within participants design, with some stimulus sets the most frequent classification was produced over 50 times and with others not more than two or three times. The main empirical finding was that cluster tightness was more important in determining category intuitiveness, than cluster separation. The results were considered in relation to the following models of unsupervised categorization: DIVA, the rational model, the simplicity model, SUSTAIN, an Unsupervised version of the Generalized Context Model (UGCM), and a simple geometric model based on similarity. DIVA, the geometric approach, SUSTAIN, and the UGCM provided good, though not perfect, fits. Overall, the present work highlights several theoretical and practical issues regarding unsupervised categorization and reveals weaknesses in some of the corresponding formal models.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Psychology
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Uncontrolled Keywords: Unsupervised categorization; Category variability; Computational models; Similarity
Publisher: Elsevier
ISSN: 0010-0277
Last Modified: 06 May 2021 01:26
URI: https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/11460

Citation Data

Cited 35 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item