A cross-linguistic study in learning prosodic rhythms: rules, constraints, and similarity

Bailey, Todd M., Plunkett, Kim and Scarpa, Ester 1999. A cross-linguistic study in learning prosodic rhythms: rules, constraints, and similarity. Language and Speech 42 (1) , pp. 1-38. 10.1177/00238309990420010101

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Differences in the learnability of linguistic patterns may be crucial in deciding among alternative learning models. This paper compares the ability of English speakers (Experiment1) and Portuguese speakers (Experiment 2) to learn two complex rhythm patterns observed in languages with primary word stress. Subjects were familiarized with one of two rhythms during a discrimination task, followed by a recognition task which tested whether knowledge of the rhythm generalized to novel stimuli. The main findings were: (1) speakers trained on the cross-linguisticallyless common rhythm distinguished between novel stimuli which did or didnot conform to their training rhythm, while speakers trained on the more common rhythm did not;(2) English speakers were biased more strongly than Portuguese speakers against final stress; and (3) melodies that are on a boundary between rhythm categories were treated as less prototypical than other members of the same rhythm category. The results demonstrate that knowledge of complex linguistic rhythms can be generalized after very little training, and that the less common rhythm is easier to learn even though it seems more complex. The results are compared with general-purpose exemplar-based learning models as well as abstract linguistic theories of word stress acquisition.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Psychology
Subjects:	R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Artificial grammar ; Learning prosody ; Rhythm stress
Publisher:	SAGE Publications
ISSN:	0023-8309
Last Modified:	06 May 2021 01:26
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/11462

Citation Data

Cited 15 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item