Advancing impact prediction and hypothesis testing in invasion ecology using a comparative functional response approach

Dick, Jaimie T. A., Alexander, Mhairi E., Jeschke, Jonathan M., Ricciardi, Anthony, MacIsaac, Hugh J., Robinson, Tamara B., Kumschick, Sabrina, Weyl, Olaf L. F., Dunn, Alison M., Hatcher, Melanie J., Paterson, Rachel, Farnsworth, Keith D. and Richardson, David M. 2014. Advancing impact prediction and hypothesis testing in invasion ecology using a comparative functional response approach. Biological Invasions 16 (4) , pp. 735-753. 10.1007/s10530-013-0550-8

Preview

PDF (This article is published under an open access license) - Published Version Download (392kB) | Preview

Abstract

Invasion ecology urgently requires predictive methodologies that can forecast the ecological impacts of existing, emerging and potential invasive species. We argue that many ecologically damaging invaders are characterised by their more efficient use of resources. Consequently, comparison of the classical ‘functional response’ (relationship between resource use and availability) between invasive and trophically analogous native species may allow prediction of invader ecological impact. We review the utility of species trait comparisons and the history and context of the use of functional responses in invasion ecology, then present our framework for the use of comparative functional responses. We show that functional response analyses, by describing the resource use of species over a range of resource availabilities, avoids many pitfalls of ‘snapshot’ assessments of resource use. Our framework demonstrates how comparisons of invader and native functional responses, within and between Type II and III functional responses, allow testing of the likely population-level outcomes of invasions for affected species. Furthermore, we describe how recent studies support the predictive capacity of this method; for example, the invasive ‘bloody red shrimp’ Hemimysis anomala shows higher Type II functional responses than native mysids and this corroborates, and could have predicted, actual invader impacts in the field. The comparative functional response method can also be used to examine differences in the impact of two or more invaders, two or more populations of the same invader, and the abiotic (e.g. temperature) and biotic (e.g. parasitism) context-dependencies of invader impacts. Our framework may also address the previous lack of rigour in testing major hypotheses in invasion ecology, such as the ‘enemy release’ and ‘biotic resistance’ hypotheses, as our approach explicitly considers demographic consequences for impacted resources, such as native and invasive prey species. We also identify potential challenges in the application of comparative functional responses in invasion ecology. These include incorporation of numerical responses, multiple predator effects and trait-mediated indirect interactions, replacement versus non-replacement study designs and the inclusion of functional responses in risk assessment frameworks. In future, the generation of sufficient case studies for a meta-analysis could test the overall hypothesis that comparative functional responses can indeed predict invasive species impacts

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Biosciences
Publisher:	Springer Verlag (Germany)
ISSN:	1387-3547
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	23 November 2018
Date of Acceptance:	16 September 2013
Last Modified:	06 May 2023 05:28
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/116739

Citation Data

Cited 199 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item