Response to Edwards and Ogilvie

Foreman-Peck, James and Zhou, Peng 2019. Response to Edwards and Ogilvie. Economic History Review 72 (4) , pp. 1477-1450. 10.1111/ehr.12819 Item availability restricted.

PDF - Accepted Post-Print Version Restricted to Repository staff only until 1 April 2021 due to copyright restrictions. Download (148kB)

Abstract

Our article on ‘Late marriage as a contributor to the industrial revolution in England’ is intended to show that the evidence is consistent with the European marriage pattern being a major influence on long‐run English economic development, through the accumulation of human capital, broadly defined. Edwards and Ogilvie assert that our approach is inadequate because, they claim, we consider neither other influences on English industrialization, such as non‐familial institutions, nor other European economies where marriage age was high throughout the early modern period but where industrialization came later. We do allow for other influences on English industrialization in our model, and the observation that some late industrializers had later marriage than England does not refute our contention, which we test appropriately by simulating the model.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Business (Including Economics)
Publisher:	Wiley
ISSN:	0013-0117
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	16 April 2019
Date of Acceptance:	1 April 2019
Last Modified:	12 Mar 2020 17:50
URI:	http://orca.cf.ac.uk/id/eprint/121319

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item