Aczel, Balazs, Hoekstra, Rink, Gelman, Andrew, Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan, Klugkist, Irene G., Rouder, Jeffrey N., Vandekerckhove, Joachim, Lee, Michael D., Morey, Richard D., Vanpaemel, Wolf, Dienes, Zoltan and Ravenzwaaij, Don van 2020. Discussion points for Bayesian inference. Nature Human Behaviour 4 , pp. 561-563. 10.1038/s41562-019-0807-z |
|
PDF
- Accepted Post-Print Version
Download (142kB) | Preview |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0807-z
Abstract
Why is there no consensual way of conducting Bayesian analyses? We present a summary of agreements and disagreements of the authors on several discussion points regarding Bayesian inference. We also provide a thinking guideline to assist researchers in conducting Bayesian inference in the social and behavioural sciences.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Psychology |
Publisher: | Nature Publishing Group |
ISSN: | 2397-3374 |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 14 November 2019 |
Date of Acceptance: | 23 October 2019 |
Last Modified: | 24 Nov 2020 22:32 |
URI: | http://orca.cf.ac.uk/id/eprint/126822 |
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |