Discussion points for Bayesian inference

Aczel, Balazs, Hoekstra, Rink, Gelman, Andrew, Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan, Klugkist, Irene G., Rouder, Jeffrey N., Vandekerckhove, Joachim, Lee, Michael D., Morey, Richard D., Vanpaemel, Wolf, Dienes, Zoltan and Ravenzwaaij, Don van 2020. Discussion points for Bayesian inference. Nature Human Behaviour 4 , pp. 561-563. 10.1038/s41562-019-0807-z

Preview

PDF - Accepted Post-Print Version Download (142kB) | Preview

Abstract

Why is there no consensual way of conducting Bayesian analyses? We present a summary of agreements and disagreements of the authors on several discussion points regarding Bayesian inference. We also provide a thinking guideline to assist researchers in conducting Bayesian inference in the social and behavioural sciences.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Psychology
Publisher:	Nature Publishing Group
ISSN:	2397-3374
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	14 November 2019
Date of Acceptance:	23 October 2019
Last Modified:	24 Nov 2020 22:32
URI:	http://orca.cf.ac.uk/id/eprint/126822

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item