Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

The rise of non-medical prescribing and medical dominance

Weiss, Marjorie C. 2020. The rise of non-medical prescribing and medical dominance. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.05.015
Item availability restricted.

[img] PDF - Accepted Post-Print Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 16 May 2021 due to copyright restrictions.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (286kB)

Abstract

This article contributes to the continuing debate on the professional dominance of medicine given the rising number of professions allied to medicine that now have the legal authority to prescribe and could potentially threaten this dominance. The key questions addressed are whether non-medical prescribers represent a threat to the dominance of medicine and if they do not, what has mediated doctors' response to these newer prescribers such that they are able to retain dominance? Drawing on Abbott's work on jurisdictional claims, this paper explores how the rise of non-medical prescribing has led to competing jurisdictional claims over prescribing between doctors and non-medical prescribers. This paper particularly focuses on pharmacist prescribing and how competing jurisdictional claims could be settled. It discusses why the profession of medicine is still dominant and the importance of professional ideologies to influencing the outcome of competing jurisdictional claims. The professional ideology of medicine has shifted from valuing prescribing to valuing the indeterminacy involved in complex clinical decision making, illustrating medicine's ability to adapt, retain dominance and maintain cultural authority over clinical knowledge. In contrast, pharmacist prescribers' professional ideology involves having specialist medicines expertise and being safe prescribers. Pharmacists draw upon this ideology to argue their unique competence as a prescriber: given their pharmacological knowledge and attention to detail which facilitates their role as clinical checker or ‘safety net’ on prescribing. However, medicine's cultural authority in clinical decision-making enables, when there are competing jurisdictional claims over prescribing, for doctors to retain intellectual jurisdiction: control over the cognitive knowledge base involved in prescribing and clinical decision making. Could this be eroded to a weaker form of control involving advisory jurisdiction? Should political developments further favour the widespread acceptance of prescribing as a core part of the pharmacist's role, an erosion to advisory jurisdiction may yet be possible.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Published Online
Status: In Press
Schools: Pharmacy
Publisher: Elsevier
ISSN: 1551-7411
Date of First Compliant Deposit: 17 June 2020
Date of Acceptance: 13 May 2020
Last Modified: 18 Jun 2020 14:15
URI: http://orca.cf.ac.uk/id/eprint/132569

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics