Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Consent for the paediatric patient

Jones, Andrew, Hyde, James, Lee, Sharon, Albadri, Sondos and Gartshore, Laura 2023. Consent for the paediatric patient. Faculty Dental Journal 14 (2) , pp. 70-75. 10.1308/rcsfdj.2023.16

[thumbnail of Figure 1 Parental Responsibility Form.jpg] Image (JPEG) - Supplemental Material
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (398kB)
[thumbnail of Figure 2 Individuals who provided consent when it could be established who had PR from the records (002).jpg] Image (JPEG) - Accepted Post-Print Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (34kB)
[thumbnail of table 2] PDF (table 2) - Supplemental Material
Download (44kB)
[thumbnail of table] PDF (table) - Supplemental Material
Download (147kB)
[thumbnail of Manuscript - Consent for the paediatric patient_.pdf] PDF - Accepted Post-Print Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (168kB)

Abstract

Introduction Obtaining valid consent is a fundamental process in dentistry. Written consent must be obtained where treatment involves conscious sedation or general anaesthesia. For children, consent may be provided by a person with parental responsibility (PR). Methods A retrospective evaluation was completed of 160 children over 2 UK hospital sites with paediatric services. Cases involving conscious sedation or general anaesthesia for dental treatment were selected. Data were obtained to establish whether it was documented that the correct person had provided consent for a child and whether all possible individuals with PR for the child were identified at the initial visit. UK national legislation and guidance was reviewed, from which a PR form (to determine PR status for a child) was created and implemented. A second evaluation was subsequently completed, again with 160 children. Results Combined data from both sites confirmed documentation of an appropriate person providing consent in 127 cases (79%) in the first evaluation. This improved to 155 cases (97%) following implementation of the PR form. All possible individuals who had PR for the child were identified at the initial visit in 35 cases (22%). This improved to 139 cases (87%) following the introduction of the PR form. Conclusions Use of a PR form improved documentation regarding valid consent for children.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Dentistry
Publisher: The Royal College of Surgeons of England
ISSN: 2042-6852
Date of First Compliant Deposit: 15 May 2023
Date of Acceptance: 31 January 2023
Last Modified: 11 Oct 2023 20:07
URI: https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/159501

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics