Caring for patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures across England and Wales in 2021

Jones, Conor S., Eardley, William G. P., Johansen, Antony, Inman, Dominic S. and Evans, Jonathan T. 2023. Caring for patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures across England and Wales in 2021. Bone & Joint Open 4 (5) , pp. 378-384. 10.1302/2633-1462.45.bjo-2023-0011.r1

PDF - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (376kB)

Abstract

<h4>Aims</h4>The aim of this study was to describe services available to patients with periprosthetic femoral fracture (PPFF) in England and Wales, with focus on variation between centres and areas for care improvement.<h4>Methods</h4>This work used data freely available from the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) facilities survey in 2021, which asked 21 questions about the care of patients with PPFFs, and nine relating to clinical decision-making around a hypothetical case.<h4>Results</h4>Of 174 centres contributing data to the NHFD, 161 provided full responses and 139 submitted data on PPFF. Lack of resources was cited as the main reason for not submitting data. Surgeon (44.6%) and theatre (29.7%) availability were reported as the primary reasons for surgical delay beyond 36 hours. Less than half had a formal process for a specialist surgeon to operate on PPFF at least every other day. The median number of specialist surgeons at each centre was four (interquartile range (IQR) 3 to 6) for PPFF around both hips and knees. Around one-third of centres reported having one dedicated theatre list per week. The routine discussion of patients with PPFF at local and regional multidisciplinary team meetings was lower than that for all-cause revision arthroplasties. Six centres reported transferring all patients with PPFF around a hip joint to another centre for surgery, and this was an occasional practice for a further 34. The management of the hypothetical clinical scenario was varied, with 75 centres proposing ORIF, 35 suggested revision surgery and 48 proposed a combination of both revision and fixation.<h4>Conclusion</h4>There is considerable variation in both the organization of PPFF services England and Wales, and in the approach taken to an individual case. The rising incidence of PPFF and complexity of these patients highlight the need for pathway development. The adoption of networks may reduce variability and improve outcomes for patients with PPFF.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Medicine
Publisher:	British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
ISSN:	2633-1462
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	27 November 2023
Last Modified:	27 Nov 2023 14:30
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/164086

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item