Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Deliberating Tarceva: a case study of how British NHS managers decide whether to purchase a high-cost drug in the shadow of NICE guidance

Hughes, D. and Doheny, Shane 2011. Deliberating Tarceva: a case study of how British NHS managers decide whether to purchase a high-cost drug in the shadow of NICE guidance. Social Science & Medicine 73 (10) , pp. 1460-1468. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.08.023

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

This paper examines audio-recorded data from meetings in which NHS managers decide whether to fund high-cost drugs for individual patients. It investigates the work of a Welsh individual patient commissioning (IPC) panel responsible for sanctioning the purchase of 'un-commissioned' treatments for exceptional cases. The case study presented highlights the changing rationales used for approving or denying a cancer drug, Tarceva, during a period when NICE first suggested it was not cost effective, but then changed its position in a final technology appraisal recommending use when the cost did not exceed that of an alternative product. Our data show how decisions taken in the shadow of NICE guidance remain complex and subject to local discretion. Guidance that takes time to prepare, is released in stages, and relates to particular disease stages, must be interpreted in the context of particular cases. The case-based IPC panel discourse stands in tension with the standardised population-based recommendations in guidance. Panel members, who based their decisions on the central notions of 'efficacy' and 'exceptionality', often struggled to apply NICE information on cost-effectiveness to their deliberations on efficacy (clinical effectiveness). The case study suggests that the complex nature of decision making makes standardization of outcomes very difficult to achieve, so that local professional judgement is likely to remain central to health care rationing at this level.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Geography and Planning (GEOPL)
Subjects: R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
Uncontrolled Keywords: UK; NICE guidance; NHS commissioners; Decision making; High-cost drugs; Rationing; Cancer; Habermas; Managers; Wales
Publisher: Elsevier
ISSN: 0277-9536
Last Modified: 07 Nov 2019 09:06
URI: http://orca.cf.ac.uk/id/eprint/17390

Citation Data

Cited 16 times in Google Scholar. View in Google Scholar

Cited 16 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item