Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Backstage in legal theatre: a Foucauldian interpretation of 'Rationes Decidendi' on the question of taxable business profits

Edgley, Carla Rhianon 2010. Backstage in legal theatre: a Foucauldian interpretation of 'Rationes Decidendi' on the question of taxable business profits. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 21 (7) , pp. 560-572. 10.1016/j.cpa.2010.03.008

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Uncertainty about the concept of taxable business profits in UK tax statute has resulted in a divergence of views between tax-payers and the state which has frequently required judicial mediation. In this study, a dual Foucauldian/dramaturgical lens is deployed to critically evaluate factors that have influenced the enactment of truth games and the order of judicial codified discourse in case law dramas. Three sources of empirical data are examined including landmark tax cases, judicial writings and biographical material. Novel use is made of the unpublished autobiography of Baron Nathaniel Lindley (1828–1921). His memoirs provide an unusual and candid glimpse backstage into the dramatis personae and modus operandi of judges who presided over tax cases in the Court of Appeal. The principal findings of this study suggest that judicial codified discourse has a history contingent upon mutable variables including the position of the judiciary (who spoke in a case and who did not, what was said or left unsaid), procedures and constraints embedded in the ritual of legal theatre, with implications for the codification process. Once tax rules are established the valid ‘noise to discourse’ from dissenting judicial opinions is lost. The courts offer a heuristic mechanism for problem solving but without reference to Foucauldian materiality, the development of judge-made practice codes may, at times, be limited to the play of legal semantics. Approaches to the resolution of ambiguity in tax legislation that are grounded in a less ritualised form of discourse may yield more representative results than approaches based solely on the parole however brilliant, of a few individual judges.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Business (Including Economics)
Subjects: H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
H Social Sciences > HG Finance
Uncontrolled Keywords: Taxation; Businesses; Legal reasoning; Judges; Codified discourse; Foucault; Dramaturgy
Publisher: Elsevier
ISSN: 1045-2354
Last Modified: 04 Jun 2017 03:20
URI: http://orca.cf.ac.uk/id/eprint/19819

Citation Data

Cited 6 times in Google Scholar. View in Google Scholar

Cited 7 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item