Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Comparing the effectiveness of face to face and computer mediated collaboration

Hatem, Wadhah Amer Hatem, Kwan, Alan Shu Khen and Miles, John Christopher 2012. Comparing the effectiveness of face to face and computer mediated collaboration. Advanced Engineering Informatics 26 (2) , pp. 383-395. 10.1016/j.aei.2012.01.001

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

In the construction industry, the need for collaboration between people who are geographically remote is a reoccurring feature. The traditional way of handing this is collocation but this is expensive and disruptive and so increasingly, use has been made of remote collaboration using computational technology over networks. This raises a concern that such a form of working may lose some of the natural richness of human communication which, in turn, will impair the ability of the participants to effectively undertake tasks of a technical nature. To assess whether or not this is so, a carefully controlled set of experiments has been undertaken using twenty pairs of people who are required to work on a partially developed simple design task. The work is undertaken using computer mediated communication supported by a 3D CAD package. As a control, the same pairs have also undertaken a similar design task working face to face. The principal objective is not to simulate a real construction project with all its complexities, but to evaluate collaboration using tasks of a construction design nature. The results show that, for the type of task used (which, by real life construction design standard, are rather simplistic in nature), people collaborating using computer mediated communication, at worst are as effective as people working face to face and are probably actually slightly more effective. This is a surprising result since computer mediated communication lack rich and valuable non-verbal aspects of communication.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Engineering
Subjects: H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
T Technology > TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
Uncontrolled Keywords: Collaboration; Communication; Team productivity; Emotions; Behaviour profile; Number of exchanges
Publisher: Elsevier
ISSN: 1474-0346
Last Modified: 08 Jun 2017 02:27
URI: http://orca.cf.ac.uk/id/eprint/25221

Citation Data

Cited 11 times in Google Scholar. View in Google Scholar

Cited 5 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Cited 3 times in Web of Science. View in Web of Science.

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item