Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

The importance and complexity of regret in the measurement of 'good' decisions: a systematic review and a content analysis of existing assessment instruments

Joseph-Williams, Natalie J., Edwards, Adrian G. and Elwyn, Glyn 2011. The importance and complexity of regret in the measurement of 'good' decisions: a systematic review and a content analysis of existing assessment instruments. Health Expectations 14 (1) , pp. 59-83. 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00621.x

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Background or context Regret is a common consequence of decisions, including those decisions related to individuals’ health. Several assessment instruments have been developed that attempt to measure decision regret. However, recent research has highlighted the complexity of regret. Given its relevance to shared decision making, it is important to understand its conceptualization and the instruments used to measure it. Objectives To review current conceptions of regret. To systematically identify instruments used to measure decision regret and assess whether they capture recent conceptualizations of regret. Search strategy Five electronic databases were searched in 2008. Search strategies used a combination of MeSH terms (or database equivalent) and free text searching under the following key headings: ‘Decision’ and ‘regret’ and ‘measurement’. Follow-up manual searches were also performed. Inclusion criteria Articles were included if they reported the development and psychometric testing of an instrument designed to measure decision regret, or the use of a previously developed and tested instrument. Main results Thirty-two articles were included: 10 report the development and validation of an instrument that measures decision regret and 22 report the use of a previously developed and tested instrument. Content analysis found that existing instruments for the measurement of regret do not capture current conceptualizations of regret and they do not enable the construct of regret to be measured comprehensively. Conclusions Existing instrumentation requires further development. There is also a need to clarify the purpose for using regret assessment instruments as this will, and should, focus their future application.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Medicine
Subjects: R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
Uncontrolled Keywords: decision quality, decision making, instrument, patient decisions, regret, scale
Publisher: Wiley
ISSN: 1369-6513
Last Modified: 04 Jun 2017 03:46
URI: http://orca.cf.ac.uk/id/eprint/26407

Citation Data

Cited 17 times in Google Scholar. View in Google Scholar

Cited 27 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Cited 7 times in Web of Science. View in Web of Science.

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item