Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Use of PCR for diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Mengoli, Carlo, Cruciani, Mario, Barnes, Rosemary Ann, Loeffler, Juergen and Donnelly, J. Peter 2009. Use of PCR for diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 9 (2) , pp. 89-96. 10.1016/S1473-3099(09)70019-2

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

A systematic review and meta-analysis was done on the use of PCR tests for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis. Data from more than 10 000 blood, serum, or plasma samples obtained from 1618 patients at risk for invasive aspergillosis were retrieved from 16 studies. Overall, the mean diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) of PCR for proven and probable cases were similar whether two consecutive positive samples were required to define positivity (DOR 15·97 [95% CI 6·83–37·34]) or a single positive PCR test was required (DOR 16·41 [95% CI 6·43–41·88]). Sensitivity and specificity of PCR for two consecutive positive samples were 0·75 (95% CI 0·54–0·88) and 0·87 (95% CI 0·78–0·93), respectively, and if only a single positive sample was required, these values were 0·88 (95% CI 0·75–0·94) and 0·75 (95% CI 0·63–0·84), respectively. Whereas specificity based on a single positive test was significantly lower (p=0·027) than two positive tests, the sensitivity and DOR did not differ significantly. A single PCR-negative result is thus sufficient to exclude a diagnosis of proven or probable invasive aspergillosis. However, two positive tests are required to confirm the diagnosis because the specificity is higher than that attained from a single positive test. Populations at risk varied and there was a lack of homogeneity of the PCR methods used. Efforts are underway to devise a standard for Aspergillus sp PCR for screening, which will help enable formal validation of PCR and estimate its use in patients most likely to benefit.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Medicine
Subjects: Q Science > QR Microbiology
R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine
Publisher: Elsevier
ISSN: 1473-3099
Last Modified: 04 Jun 2017 03:52
URI: http://orca.cf.ac.uk/id/eprint/28480

Citation Data

Cited 226 times in Google Scholar. View in Google Scholar

Cited 253 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item