Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Quality improvement in general practice: enabling general practitioners to judge ethical dilemmas

Tapp, Laura, Edwards, Adrian G., Elwyn, Glyn, Holm, Soren and Eriksson, Tina 2010. Quality improvement in general practice: enabling general practitioners to judge ethical dilemmas. Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (3) , pp. 184-188. 10.1136/jme.2009.032078

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Quality improvement (QI) is fundamental to maintaining high standards of health care. Significant debate exists concerning the necessity for an ethical approval system for those QI projects that push the boundaries, appearing more similar to research than QI. The authors discuss this issue identifying the core ethical issues in family medicine (FM), drawing upon the fundamental principles of medical ethics, including principles of autonomy, utility, justice and non-maleficence. Recent debate concerning the application of QI ethics boards is discussed with relevance to primary care and issues such as general practitioner (GP) intentions, the impact of QI on patients and the use of confidential patient data and the impact of dissemination. The authors conclude that a system of QI ethical approval leaves many issues unresolved and potentially creates several barriers to implementing QI. To ensure ethical QI work is generated within FM it is essential for GPs to learn about and engage in more ethical reflection so that they can better judge and resolve these issues.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Psychology
Medicine
Law
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BJ Ethics
R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
Publisher: BMJ Journals
ISSN: 0306-6800
Last Modified: 09 Jan 2018 20:16
URI: http://orca.cf.ac.uk/id/eprint/28825

Citation Data

Cited 14 times in Google Scholar. View in Google Scholar

Cited 6 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Cited 5 times in Web of Science. View in Web of Science.

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item