Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Identifying and prioritising epilepsy treatment uncertainties

Thomas, Rhys Huw, Hammond, C. L., Bodger, O. G., Rees, Mark I. and Smith, Philip E. M. 2010. Identifying and prioritising epilepsy treatment uncertainties. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 81 (8) , pp. 918-921. 10.1136/jnnp.2009.192716

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify and prioritise uncertainties regarding epilepsy treatment from people with epilepsy, their carers and epilepsy clinicians. BACKGROUND: Failure to acknowledge and address genuine treatment uncertainties has caused unnecessary iatrogenic harm. The authors define an uncertainty as a question that cannot be sufficiently answered by a systematic review of the literature. The database of the uncertainties of the effects of treatment (DUETs) is a collection of 'known unknowns' that enables patient-prioritised research. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: The authors organised five separate focus groups (two consisting of clinicians, three of patients and carers) to garner questions on epilepsy treatment uncertainties; these yielded 398 potential research questions. Participants were asked to rank the questions in terms of importance. The authors then performed a thematic analysis. RESULTS: Patients rated questions concerning cognitive drug side effects, managing the consequences of side effects and improving public awareness about the treatment of epilepsy through improved services as most important. For clinicians, the most important themes were treatment programmes for non-epileptic attack disorder (NEAD), concerns about side effects in utero and uncertainties regarding prescribing in pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Patient uncertainties were often focussed on very practical considerations-how to take prescribed medication, access to services and how to minimise drug side effects. Clinicians' questions were also practical but clustered around 'the challenging consultation'-for example, NEAD, sudden unexplained death in epilepsy and prescribing in pregnancy. The authors have published the research questions on NHS Evidence and are working with them to identify those questions which represent genuine uncertainties. The authors encourage other clinicians to seek patient and carers' priorities in order to shape their research agenda.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Medicine
Neuroscience and Mental Health Research Institute (NMHRI)
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group
ISSN: 0022-3050
Last Modified: 04 Jun 2017 03:55
URI: http://orca.cf.ac.uk/id/eprint/29218

Citation Data

Cited 10 times in Google Scholar. View in Google Scholar

Cited 15 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item