Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Legal and ethical consequences of international biobanking from a national perspective: the German BMB-EUCoop project

Goebel, Jürgen W., Pickardt, Thomas, Bedau, Maren, Fuchs, Michael, Lenk, Christian, Paster, Inga, Spranger, Tarde M., Stockter, Ulrich, Bauer, Ulrike, Cooper, David Neil and Krawczak, Michael 2010. Legal and ethical consequences of international biobanking from a national perspective: the German BMB-EUCoop project. European Journal of Human Genetics 18 (5) , pp. 522-525. 10.1038/ejhg.2009.214

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

The international transfer of human biomaterial and data has become a prerequisite for collaborative biomedical research to be successful. However, although a national legal framework for ‘biobanking’ has already been formulated in many countries, little is known about how an international exchange of data and samples might affect the legal position of national biobanks and their donors. The German Telematics Platform and the Competence Network ‘Congenital Heart Defects’ jointly instigated a project (BMB-EUCoop) to (i) identify and assess the legal risks ensuing for biobanks and their donors in the context of Europe-wide research collaborations, (ii) devise practical recommendations to minimize or avoid these risks, and (iii) provide generic informational text, contracts and agreements to facilitate their practical implementation. Four different countries were included in the study; namely, the UK, Netherlands, Austria and Switzerland. The results of the study indicate that the degree of similarity between legal systems in different countries varies according to the respective field of jurisdiction. Although personality and property rights have long been enshrined in virtually identical pieces of law, the applicable medical professional regulations were found to be somewhat heterogeneous. Furthermore, clear-cut differences were often found to be lacking between regulations that reflect either ‘soft law’ or the nationally binding ‘hard law’ that has emerged from it. In view of the potential ambiguities, the experts uniformly concluded that the rights and interests of national (in this case, German) biobanks and their donors would be best protected by explicitly addressing any uncertainties in formal contractual agreements.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Medicine
Subjects: Q Science > QH Natural history > QH426 Genetics
R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA1001 Forensic Medicine. Medical jurisprudence. Legal medicine
Publisher: Nature Publishing Group
ISSN: 1018-4813
Last Modified: 04 Jun 2017 03:59
URI: http://orca.cf.ac.uk/id/eprint/30179

Citation Data

Cited 19 times in Google Scholar. View in Google Scholar

Cited 11 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item