Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

In what way does the parietal ERP old/new effect index recollection?

Wilding, Edward Lewis 2000. In what way does the parietal ERP old/new effect index recollection? International Journal of Psychophysiology 35 (1) , pp. 81-87. 10.1016/S0167-8760(99)00095-1

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded while subjects performed a memory retrieval task requiring old/new judgements to visually presented old (previously studied) and new words. For words judged old, subjects made two binary forced-choice context (hereafter source) judgements, denoting the voice (male/female) and task (action/liking) with which the test word had been associated at study. By separating the ERPs according to the accuracy of the voice and task judgements, it was possible to test the prediction that the differences between ERPs to correctly identified old and new words at parietal scalp sites (parietal old/new effects) are sensitive to the amount or quality of information that is retrieved from episodic memory (Rugg, M.D., Cox, C.J.C., Doyle, M.C., Wells, T., 1995. Event-related potentials and the recollection of low and high frequency words. Neuropsychologia 33, 471–484). In keeping with this proposal, the magnitude of the parietal old/new effects co-varied with the number of accurate source judgements. This finding is consistent with proposals that the parietal old/new effect indexes recollection in a graded fashion.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Psychology
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
Uncontrolled Keywords: Recollection; Source memory; Event-related potentials; Old/new effects; Episodic memory
Publisher: Elsevier
ISSN: 0167-8760
Last Modified: 17 Jun 2017 06:15
URI: http://orca.cf.ac.uk/id/eprint/33548

Citation Data

Cited 176 times in Google Scholar. View in Google Scholar

Cited 176 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Cited 140 times in Web of Science. View in Web of Science.

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item