Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Electrophysiological evidence for dissociable processes contributing to recollection

Allan, Kevin, Wilding, Edward Lewis and Rugg, Michael D. 1998. Electrophysiological evidence for dissociable processes contributing to recollection. Acta Psychologica 98 (2-3) , pp. 231-252. 10.1016/S0001-6918(97)00044-9

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

This paper reviews a number of studies in which we have employed event-related potentials (ERPs) to investigate the cognitive processes which contribute to conscious recollection. Across a range of tasks (including recognition memory, source memory, associative recall and word-stem cued recall) there is evidence for the proposal that recollection involves processes which are both functionally and neurologically dissociable. This evidence takes the form of temporally and topographically dissociable ERP effects, which attain their maximum amplitude when elicited by items that satisfy operational definitions for having been recollected. The ERP effects are interpreted as reflecting retrieval and post-retrieval processes which, we argue, constitute two separate components of recollection as defined within the process dissociation framework of Jacoby and colleagues. The ERP findings suggest that post-retrieval processing is particularly sensitive to task variables, implying that recollection may be neither functionally nor neurologically homogeneous.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Psychology
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
Uncontrolled Keywords: Event-related potentials; Memory; Recollection; Process-dissociation; Recognition; Familiarity; Recall
Publisher: Elsevier
ISSN: 0001-6918
Last Modified: 17 Jun 2017 06:15
URI: http://orca.cf.ac.uk/id/eprint/33551

Citation Data

Cited 238 times in Google Scholar. View in Google Scholar

Cited 183 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Cited 166 times in Web of Science. View in Web of Science.

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item