Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Evaluation of the risk of pelvic infection following transvaginal oocyte recovery

Curtis, P., Amso, Nazar Najib, Keith, E., Bernard, A. and Shaw, Robert W. 1991. Evaluation of the risk of pelvic infection following transvaginal oocyte recovery. Human Reproduction 6 (9) , pp. 1294-1297.

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

The risk of introducing infection into the peritoneal cavity at the time of transvaginal ultrasound-guided recovery of oocytes in assisted reproduction techniques was assessed by culturing peritoneal fluid samples from 25 women with unexplained infertility. The samples were collected laparoscopfcally at the time of zygote intra-Fallopian transfer (ZIFT), 24-48 h after oocyte collection. High vaginal and endocervical specimens from 25 women treated by in-vitro fertilization (TVF) and transcervkal embryo transfer were cultured for comparison. The peritoneal cultures were negative in all but one patient. High vaginal swabs grew Candida albicans in three cases and endocervical specimens were all negative. Seven and three pregnancies occurred in the ZIFT and IVF groups respectively. No pelvic damage was noted at laparoscopy in those women who had had previous treatment cycles with transvaginal oocyte recovery. This method of oocyte recovery, using prophylactic metronidazole and chlorhexidine for preoperative vaginal preparation, appears to be safe for treatment of women with no previous pelvic damage.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Medicine
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
R Medicine > RG Gynecology and obstetrics
Uncontrolled Keywords: transvaginal oocyte recovery; infection; ZIFT; unexplained infertility
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISSN: 0268-1161
Last Modified: 10 Oct 2017 14:33
URI: http://orca.cf.ac.uk/id/eprint/34309

Citation Data

Cited 21 times in Google Scholar. View in Google Scholar

Cited 18 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item