Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

The management of solitary trichoepithelioma versus basal cell carcinoma

Votruba, Marcela, Collins, C. M. P. and Harrad, R. A. 1998. The management of solitary trichoepithelioma versus basal cell carcinoma. Eye 12 (1) , pp. 43-46. 10.1038/eye.1998.7

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Currently, all lesions diagnosed clinically as basal cell carcinoma (BCC) are treated by the excision of the lesion with 3–4 mm margins followed by histopathological examination to assess clearance and confirm the diagnosis. We present the findings of surgical incisional and excisional biopsy of three young patients diagnosed on clinical examination as having BCC, who were found on histological examination to have trichoepithelioma. Whilst it may be possible to distinguish the features of trichoepithelioma in incisional biopsy specimens on morphological grounds alone it is often difficult, and immunohistochemical staining, to delineate the features of the basement membrane, provides useful additional information in the histological diagnosis. As trichoepithelioma is more common in the young it should be considered in the differential diagnosis in young patients presenting with BCC-like lesions of the periocular tissues. This subgroup of patients should have incisional biopsy carried out, and if the diagnosis of trichoepithelioma is confirmed the lesion may be excised with a small margin of healthy tissue, thereby facilitating surgical repair.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Optometry and Vision Sciences
Neuroscience and Mental Health Research Institute (NMHRI)
Subjects: R Medicine > RE Ophthalmology
Uncontrolled Keywords: Eyelid; Eyelid tumours; Trichoepithelioma; Basal cell carcinoma; Reconstructive surgery
Publisher: Nature Publishing Group
ISSN: 0950-222X
Last Modified: 04 Jun 2017 04:13
URI: http://orca.cf.ac.uk/id/eprint/34883

Citation Data

Cited 12 times in Google Scholar. View in Google Scholar

Cited 17 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item