Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Face processing impairments after amygdalotomy

Young, A. W., Aggleton, John Patrick, Hellawell, D. J., Johnson, M., Broks, P. and Hanley, J. R. 1995. Face processing impairments after amygdalotomy. Brain 118 (1) , pp. 15-24. 10.1093/brain/118.1.15

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

We report an investigation of face processing impairments in D.R., a 51-year-old woman with a partial bilateral amygdalotomy. D.R. was able to recognize pre-operatively familiar faces, but she showed generalized problems of name retrieval and a more circumscribed deficit affecting the recognition of faces learnt post-operatively. In contrast to her poor memory for new faces, D.R.'s ability to match simultaneously presented photographs of unfamiliar faces was unimpaired. However, D.R. also experienced deficits in expression processing which compromised the recognition of emotion from people's faces; she was poor both at matching and at identifying photographs of emotional facial expressions. In addition, her interpretation of eye gaze direction was defective, showing a more general problem in reading social signals from the face. The presence of impairments affecting the learning of new faces and the comprehension of gaze direction and facial expressions of emotion is consistent with the hypothesis of a role for the amygdala in learning and social behaviour.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Psychology
Medicine
Neuroscience and Mental Health Research Institute (NMHRI)
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
Uncontrolled Keywords: amygdala; face recognition; facial expression; gaze direction
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISSN: 0006-8950
Last Modified: 04 Jun 2017 04:13
URI: http://orca.cf.ac.uk/id/eprint/34950

Citation Data

Cited 445 times in Google Scholar. View in Google Scholar

Cited 327 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Cited 290 times in Web of Science. View in Web of Science.

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item