Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Hypnotic imagery as a treatment for phantom limb pain: two case reports and a review

Oakley, D. A., Whitman, L. G. and Halligan, Peter 2002. Hypnotic imagery as a treatment for phantom limb pain: two case reports and a review. Clinical Rehabilitation 16 (4) , pp. 368-377. 10.1191/0269215502cr507oa

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Objective: To provide a theoretical background, to review existing literature and to present new case material relevant to the treatment of phantom limb pain using hypnotic imagery. Method: This paper presents two new case reports involving the use of hypnotic imagery procedures in the alleviation of phantom limb pain and reviews 10 previous clinical studies which have involved a similar approach. The earlier studies were identified by electronic and manual searches of the relevant literature. Results: Two main treatment strategies can be identified: (1) ipsative/ imagery-based approaches and (2) movement/imagery-based approaches. A common finding is the need to treat the phantom limb as a fireal’ body part, to accept its existence as a valid mental representation and to avoid treating the amputation stump as the sole source of the phantom pain sensations. Conclusion: Hypnotic procedures appear to be a useful adjunct to established strategies for the treatment of phantom limb pain and would repay further, more systematic, investigation. Suggestions are provided as to the factors which should be considered for a more systematic research programme.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Psychology
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
Publisher: SAGE Publications
ISSN: 0269-2155
Last Modified: 04 Jun 2017 04:14
URI: http://orca.cf.ac.uk/id/eprint/35205

Citation Data

Cited 59 times in Google Scholar. View in Google Scholar

Cited 46 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Cited 21 times in Web of Science. View in Web of Science.

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item