Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

The development of a mandrel peel test for the measurement of adhesive fracture toughness of epoxy-metal laminates

Kawashita, Luiz, Moore, D. R. and Williams, J. G. 2004. The development of a mandrel peel test for the measurement of adhesive fracture toughness of epoxy-metal laminates. The Journal of Adhesion 80 (3) , pp. 147-167. 10.1080/00218460490279215

Full text not available from this repository.


A mandrel peel test is established for measuring the adhesive fracture toughness of a metal/rubber-toughened epoxy laminate system. By adopting an energy balance analysis it is possible to determine directly both adhesive fracture toughness and plastic work in bending the peel arm around the mandrel. The suitability of the procedure is examined for various types of metal peel arms, which are classified in terms of their ability to deform plastically during the test. The plastic work is also predicted theoretically, and comparisons are made between the measured and calculated values. The fracture energies determined from the mandrel tests are compared with those obtained from 90° fixed-arm peel tests. For the calculations of plastic work in bending in the fixed arm test, various options are used when modelling the tensile stress-strain behaviour of the peel arm material. In addition, the adhesive layer thickness is considered in terms of its influence on the calculation of adhesive fracture toughness.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Engineering
Centre for Advanced Manufacturing Systems At Cardiff (CAMSAC)
Subjects: T Technology > TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
T Technology > TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
Uncontrolled Keywords: Adhesive fracture toughness; Peel strength; Metal-polymer laminates; Fracture mechanics; Mandrel peel; Fixed arm peel; Plastic work
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
ISSN: 0021-8464
Last Modified: 19 Mar 2016 23:04

Citation Data

Cited 19 times in Google Scholar. View in Google Scholar

Cited 25 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item