Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Electoral discourse analysis of civil conflict resolution: the case of Northern Ireland in UK statewide elections 1970-2010

Chaney, Paul 2013. Electoral discourse analysis of civil conflict resolution: the case of Northern Ireland in UK statewide elections 1970-2010. Irish Political Studies 28 (1) , pp. 1-19. 10.1080/07907184.2012.688033

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

This paper focuses on the principal parties' manifestos in UK statewide elections 1970–2010. It makes an original contribution by using a mixed methodology to examine the electoral discourse, issue-salience and policy framing associated with civil conflict resolution (CCR) proposals for Northern Ireland. Mandate and accountability theory suggest that party programmes may play an important role in understanding CCR. Accordingly, a series of hypotheses is tested and the findings used to advance an Electoral Discourse Model of Civil Conflict Resolution. The findings show that electoral politics matter in shaping CCR. Statistically significant inter-party differences in issue-salience and policy framing are revealed as parties seek to secure ‘issue-ownership’, influence voter preferences and secure a mandate for action. An iterative inter-party process is shown to lead to frame convergence over time, thereby providing an indicator of progress towards conflict resolution.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Social Sciences (Includes Criminology and Education)
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HT Communities. Classes. Races
J Political Science > JN Political institutions (Europe) > JN101 Great Britain
Uncontrolled Keywords: civil conflict; resolution; peace; issue-salience; policy framing; manifesto; elections
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
ISSN: 0790-7184
Last Modified: 04 Jun 2017 04:32
URI: http://orca.cf.ac.uk/id/eprint/40591

Citation Data

Cited 5 times in Google Scholar. View in Google Scholar

Cited 5 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item