Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

A survey of anaesthetic practice in predicting difficult intubation in UK and Europe

McPherson, Duncan, Vaughan, Ralph, Wilkes, Antony Robert, Mapleson, William and Hodzovic, Iljaz 2012. A survey of anaesthetic practice in predicting difficult intubation in UK and Europe. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 29 (5) , pp. 218-222. 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32835103e6

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Context: Unexpected difficulty in tracheal intubation is an intermittent and often terrifying problem for all practising anaesthetists. There are many preoperative assessment tests to predict a difficult laryngeal view or a difficult intubation, but we found no published evidence of how frequently these predictive tests are used or how useful they are perceived to be by anaesthetists. Objective: We decided to ask UK and non-UK anaesthetists attending the Annual Scientific Meeting of the European Society of Anaesthesiology about their practice in predicting difficult intubation. Design: The study was conceived as a survey. Setting: The airway tests were compiled into a questionnaire, hand distributed among anaesthetists at Euroanaesthesia – the European group (after excluding UK attendees) – and posted to randomly selected anaesthetists in the UK – the UK group. Participants: Overall, 888 of 1230 (72%) questionnaires were completed. The response rate from the UK group of anaesthetists was 69% (481 of 700) and from the European group was 77% (407 of 530). Results: On a scale 1 (never) to 5 (always), the mean score for frequency of use was similar for both groups of anaesthetists and ranged from about 4 for mouth opening to about 1 for Nodding Donkey. The mean score for usefulness (1 = useless, 5 = extremely useful) ranged from about 3.7 to 2 for the same two tests. The UK group found most tests slightly less useful than did the European group. With regard to the frequency of assessing the airway, 9% of the European group, but 16% of the UK group, failed always (score 5) or regularly (score 4) to assess the airway before general anaesthesia. Furthermore, 21 and 36% of the UK and European groups, respectively, failed to do so before regional anaesthesia. Conclusion: These results are a cause for concern with regard to both airway management training and patient safety.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Medicine
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
Publisher: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
ISSN: 0265-0215
Last Modified: 11 Jun 2019 20:57
URI: http://orca.cf.ac.uk/id/eprint/42683

Citation Data

Cited 10 times in Google Scholar. View in Google Scholar

Cited 7 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item