Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Subjective logic and arguing with evidence

Oren, Nir, Norman, Timothy J. and Preece, Alun David 2007. Subjective logic and arguing with evidence. Artificial Intelligence 171 (10-15) , pp. 838-854. 10.1016/j.artint.2007.04.006

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

This paper introduces a subjective logic based argumentation framework primarily targeted at evidential reasoning. The framework explicitly caters for argument schemes, accrual of arguments, and burden of proof; these concepts appear in many types of argument, and are particularly useful in dialogues revolving around evidential reasoning. The concept of a sensor is also useful in this domain, representing a source of evidence, and is incorporated in our framework. We show how the framework copes with a number of problems that existing frameworks have difficulty dealing with, and how it can be situated within a simple dialogue game. Finally, we examine reasoning machinery that enables an agent to decide what argument to advance with the goal of maximising its utility at the end of a dialogue.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Computer Science & Informatics
Subjects: Q Science > QA Mathematics > QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
Uncontrolled Keywords: Argumentation; Dialogue game; Evidence; Subjective logic
Publisher: Elsevier
ISSN: 0004-3702
Last Modified: 04 Jun 2017 04:41
URI: http://orca.cf.ac.uk/id/eprint/42891

Citation Data

Cited 36 times in Google Scholar. View in Google Scholar

Cited 19 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Cited 9 times in Web of Science. View in Web of Science.

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item