How healthcare professionals respond to parents with religious objections to vaccination: A qualitative study

Ruijs, Wilhelmina L. M., LA Hautvast, Jeannine, van IJzendoorn, Giovanna, van Ansem, Wilke J. C., Elwyn, Glyn ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0917-6286, van der Velden, Koos and Hulscher, Marlies E. J. L. 2012. How healthcare professionals respond to parents with religious objections to vaccination: A qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research 12 (1) , pp. 231-239. 10.1186/1472-6963-12-231

Preview

PDF - Published Version Download (210kB) | Preview

Abstract

Background: In recent years healthcare professionals have faced increasing concerns about the value of childhood vaccination and many find it difficult to deal with parents who object to vaccination. In general, healthcare professionals are advised to listen respectfully to the objections of parents, provide honest information, and attempt to correct any misperceptions regarding vaccination. Religious objections are one of the possible reasons for refusing vaccination. Although religious objections have a long history, little is known about the way healthcare professionals deal with these specific objections. The aim of this study is to gain insight into the responding of healthcare professionals to parents with religious objections to the vaccination of their children. Methods: A qualitative interview study was conducted with health care professionals (HCPs) in the Netherlands who had ample experience with religious objections to vaccination. Purposeful sampling was applied in order to include HCPs with different professional and religious backgrounds. Data saturation was reached after 22 interviews, with 7 child health clinic doctors, 5 child health clinic nurses and 10 general practitioners. The interviews were thematically analyzed. Two analysts coded, reviewed, discussed, and refined the coding of the transcripts until consensus was reached. Emerging concepts were assessed using the constant comparative method from grounded theory. Results: Three manners of responding to religious objections to vaccination were identified: providing medical information, discussion of the decision-making process, and adoption of an authoritarian stance. All of the HCPs provided the parents with medical information. In addition, some HCPs discussed the decision-making process. They verified how the decision was made and if possible consequences were realized. Sometimes they also discussed religious considerations. Whether the decision-making process was discussed depended on the willingness of the parents to engage in such a discussion and on the religious background, attitudes, and communication skills of the HCPs. Only in cases of tetanus post-exposure-prophylaxis, general practitioners reported adoption of an authoritarian stance. Conclusion: Given that the provision of medical information is generally not decisive for parents with religious objections to vaccination, we recommend HCPs to discuss the vaccination decision-making process, rather than to provide them with extra medical information.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Medicine
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BL Religion R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
Uncontrolled Keywords:	vaccination, immunization, healthcare professionals, decision-making, religion, religious objections to vaccination
Additional Information:	Pdf uploaded in accordance with publisher's policy at http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/1472-6963/ (accessed 25/02/2014)
Publisher:	BioMed Central
ISSN:	1472-6963
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	30 March 2016
Last Modified:	12 May 2023 22:29
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/42947

Citation Data

Cited 17 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item