Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Social exchange in the labor market: reciprocity and trust versus egoistic money maximization

Kirchler, Erich, Fehr, Ernst and Evans, Robert John 1996. Social exchange in the labor market: reciprocity and trust versus egoistic money maximization. Journal of Economic Psychology 17 (3) , pp. 313-341. 10.1016/0167-4870(96)00013-X

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

This paper presents results from a series of experimental labor markets. The implications of standard economic theory are contrasted with social exchange predictions. According to standard economic theory, workers and employers are rational egoistic individuals who strive to maximize profit. In markets, as well as in bilateral interactions, employers should offer the lowest wages which workers will accept and workers should provide the effort level which maximizes their utility (i.e. the minimum permitted). According to social exchange principles, wage negotiations between employers and workers are not only determined by egoistic profit maximization but also by social norms. Interacting partners stick to the norm of reciprocity and reciprocate favors. Employers are supposed to trust reciprocation norms and offer higher than reservation wages, expecting workers to provide higher effort in response. Consequently, workers' effort choices are expected to be positively correlated to employers' wage offers. Four experimental conditions were realized to test hypotheses deriving from standard economic theory and social exchange theory. In general, standard economic theory was poorly supported. Reciprocation norms were found to be important and, on average, cooperation was considerably higher than predicted by economic theory. There were, however, significant differences between participants: some workers cooperated over a series of bilateral trading periods and in market situations, whereas others did not. It is argued that economic theory needs to take into account both social norms and also personality differences as well as nonstandard motives which underlie human behavior.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Centre for the Study of Knowledge Expertise and Science (KES)
Social Sciences (Includes Criminology and Education)
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor
Uncontrolled Keywords: Labor market; Experimental economics; Social exchange; Rational choice; Reciprocity
Publisher: Elsevier
ISSN: 0167-4870
Last Modified: 17 Jun 2017 08:19
URI: http://orca.cf.ac.uk/id/eprint/53765

Citation Data

Cited 59 times in Google Scholar. View in Google Scholar

Cited 31 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item