Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Sensory sluggishness dissociates saccadic, manual, and perceptual responses: An S-cone study

Bompas, Aline Elisabeth Dominique and Sumner, Petroc 2008. Sensory sluggishness dissociates saccadic, manual, and perceptual responses: An S-cone study. Journal of Vision 8 (8) , pp. 1-13. 10.1167/8.8.10

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Sensory information travels to visual and motor areas via several distinct pathways, some of them being fast—like the achromatic magnocellular and retinotectal routes—and others slower—those carrying chromatic signals, in particular S-opponent signals. It is debated whether common visual processing stages are used for different types of responses, such as initiating saccadic or manual responses or making perceptual judgments. The present paper casts new light on this question by comparing the participation of fast and slow pathways across these responses. In the first experiment, we measured manual and saccadic reaction times to luminance and S-cone signals, equated in detectability for each participant and presented on either sides of fixation. Our results show that both manual and saccadic responses are slower for S-cone stimuli. Most interestingly, this reaction time difference was twice as large for saccadic responses as for manual responses, suggesting that saccades rely more on the fast signals, not supported by S-cone stimuli, than do manual responses. In a second experiment, our participants performed temporal order judgments on pairs of luminance and S-cone stimuli. Our results show no evidence of perceived time discrepancy between the two signals, which may imply that perceptual judgments utilize different signals from either manual or saccadic responses.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Psychology
Uncontrolled Keywords: eye movements; color vision; superior colliculus/optic tectum; temporal vision
Publisher: Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
ISSN: 1534-7362
Last Modified: 04 Jun 2017 01:54
URI: http://orca.cf.ac.uk/id/eprint/5557

Citation Data

Cited 31 times in Google Scholar. View in Google Scholar

Cited 36 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item