Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Attitudes and use of rubber dam by Irish general dental practitioners

Lynch, Christopher Daniel and McConnell, R. J. 2007. Attitudes and use of rubber dam by Irish general dental practitioners. International Endodontic Journal 40 (6) , pp. 427-432. 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01212.x

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Aim To investigate the attitudes towards and use of rubber dam by Irish general dental practitioners. Methodology A pre-piloted questionnaire was distributed amongst a group of 600 dentists randomly selected from the Irish Register of Dentists. Replies from dentists working in specialist practice or the hospital dental service were excluded. Dentists were surveyed in relation to their use of rubber dam during a variety of operative and root canal treatments, as well as their attitudes to the use of rubber dam in dental practice. Results A total of 300 replies were considered from a total of 324 that were received. Seventy-seven per cent of respondents (n ¼ 231) worked in general dental practice and 23% (n ¼ 69) worked in the Irish Health Board/Community Dental Service. Rubber dam was ‘never’ used by 77% of respondents (n ¼ 228) when placing amalgam restorations in posterior teeth, 52% (n ¼ 147) when placing composite restorations in posterior teeth, and 59% (n ¼ 177) when placing composite restorations in anterior teeth. Rubber dam was ‘never’ used by 39% of respondents (n ¼ 114) when performing root canal treatment on anterior teeth; 32% (n ¼ 84) when performing root canal treatment on premolar teeth; and 26% (n ¼ 51) when performing root canal treatment on molar teeth. Fiftyseven per cent (n ¼ 171) considered rubber dam ‘cumbersome and difficult to apply’, and 41% (n ¼ 123) considered throat pack ‘as good a prevention against inhalation of endodontic instruments as rubber dam’. Conclusions Whilst rubber dam is used more frequently for root canal treatment than operative treatment, its use is limited. This presents quality issues, as well as medico-legal and safety concerns for both the profession and patients.

Item Type: Article
Status: Published
Schools: Dentistry
Subjects: R Medicine > RK Dentistry
Publisher: Wiley & Sons
ISSN: 1365-2591
Last Modified: 23 Mar 2017 04:49
URI: https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/58651

Citation Data

Cited 70 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item