Understanding the contribution of neural and physiological signal variation to the low repeatability of emotion-induced BOLD responses

Lipp, Ilona, Murphy, Kevin ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6516-313X, Wise, Richard Geoffrey ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1700-2144 and Caseras, Xavier ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8490-6891 2014. Understanding the contribution of neural and physiological signal variation to the low repeatability of emotion-induced BOLD responses. NeuroImage 86 , pp. 335-342. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.015

Preview

PDF - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (558kB) | Preview

Abstract

Previous studies have reported low repeatability of BOLD activation measures during emotion processing tasks. It is not clear, however, whether low repeatability is a result of changes in the underlying neural signal over time, or due to insufficient reliability of the acquired BOLD signal caused by noise contamination. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of “cleaning” the BOLD signal, by correcting for physiological noise and for differences in BOLD responsiveness, on measures of repeatability. Fifteen healthy volunteers were scanned on two different occasions, performing an emotion provocation task with faces (neutral, 50% fearful, 100% fearful) followed by a breath-hold paradigm to provide a marker of BOLD responsiveness. Repeatability of signal distribution (spatial repeatability) and repeatability of signal amplitude within two regions of interest (amygdala and fusiform gyrus) were estimated by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Significant repeatability of signal amplitude was only found within the right amygdala during the perception of 50% fearful faces, but disappeared when physiological noise correction was performed. Spatial repeatability was higher within the fusiform gyrus than within the amygdala, and better at the group level than at the participant level. Neither physiological noise correction, nor consideration of BOLD responsiveness, assessed through the breath-holding, increased repeatability. The findings lead to the conclusion that low repeatability of BOLD response amplitude to emotional faces is more likely to be explained by the lack of stability in the underlying neural signal than by physiological noise contamination. Furthermore, reported repeatability might be a result of repeatability of task-correlated physiological variation rather than neural activity. This means that the emotion paradigm used in this study might not be useful for studies that require the BOLD response to be a stable measure of emotional processing, for example in the context of biomarkers.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics (CNGG) Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC) Medicine Psychology Neuroscience and Mental Health Research Institute (NMHRI) Physics and Astronomy
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
Uncontrolled Keywords:	fMRI; BOLD; Repeatability; Emotion processing; Physiological noise correction
Publisher:	Elsevier
ISSN:	1053-8119
Funders:	Wellcome Trust
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	30 March 2016
Last Modified:	09 Jul 2023 17:24
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/59076

Citation Data

Cited 32 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item