Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Relational distance, neoliberalism and the regulation of animal health

Enticott, Gareth 2014. Relational distance, neoliberalism and the regulation of animal health. Geoforum 52 , pp. 42-50. 10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.12.004

[img]
Preview
PDF - Accepted Post-Print Version
Download (465kB) | Preview

Abstract

Using quantitative and qualitative data, this paper contributes to debates on the uneven geographies of neoliberal animal disease regulation. Specifically, the paper analyses the impacts of neoliberal reforms to animal disease regulation in Great Britain. Focussing on the case of bovine tuberculosis (bTB), the paper analyses how changes to ‘relational distance’ in animal disease regulation have led to closer relationships between regulators (veterinarians) and regulatees (farmers) which in turn has led to a departure from standardised disease regulation to approaches that emphasise greater flexibility and judgement. The paper presents quantitative analysis of bTB testing data revealing the gradual erosion of government control of bTB regulation and significant variations in disease diagnosis between vets in the private and public sectors. Drawing on interviews with senior veterinarians in Government and veterinary organisations, the paper shows how these regulatory structures evolved and came to be accepted despite their limitations. The paper concludes by considering how relational distance contributes to an understanding of the nature of disease and its implications for the wider regulation of animal disease.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Geography and Planning
Subjects: S Agriculture > SF Animal culture
Uncontrolled Keywords: Biosecurity; Regulation; Animal disease; Expertise; Bovine tuberculosis; Relational distance
Publisher: Elsevier
Date of First Compliant Deposit: 30 March 2016
Last Modified: 03 Jul 2019 10:47
URI: http://orca.cf.ac.uk/id/eprint/71165

Citation Data

Cited 2 times in Google Scholar. View in Google Scholar

Cited 15 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics