Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Public preferences for electronic health data storage, access and sharing - evidence from a pan-European survey

Patil, Sunil, Lu, Hui, Saunders, Catherine, Potoglou, Dimitris and Robinson, Neil 2016. Public preferences for electronic health data storage, access and sharing - evidence from a pan-European survey. JAMIA Journal of the American Medical Informatics Assocation 23 (6) , pp. 1096-1106. 10.1093/jamia/ocw012

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Objective To assess the public’s preferences regarding potential privacy threats from devices or services storing health-related personal data. Materials and Methods A pan-European survey based on a stated-preference experiment for assessing preferences for electronic health data storage, access, and sharing. Results We obtained 20 882 survey responses (94 606 preferences) from 27 EU member countries. Respondents recognized the benefits of storing electronic health information, with 75.5%, 63.9%, and 58.9% agreeing that storage was important for improving treatment quality, preventing epidemics, and reducing delays, respectively. Concerns about different levels of access by third parties were expressed by 48.9% to 60.6% of respondents. On average, compared to devices or systems that only store basic health status information, respondents preferred devices that also store identification data (coefficient/relative preference 95% CI¼0.04 [0.00-0.08], P¼0.034) and information on lifelong health conditions (coefficient¼0.13 [0.08 to 0.18], P<0.001), but there was no evidence of this for devices with information on sensitive health conditions such as mental and sexual health and addictions (coefficient¼�0.03 [�0.09 to 0.02], P¼0.24). Respondents were averse to their immediate family (coefficient¼�0.05 [�0.05 to �0.01], P¼0.011) and home care nurses (coefficient¼�0.06 [�0.11 to �0.02], P¼0.004) viewing this data, and strongly averse to health insurance companies (coefficient¼�0.43 [�0.52 to 0.34], P<0.001), private sector pharmaceutical companies (coefficient¼�0.82 [�0.99 to �0.64], P<0.001), and academic researchers (coefficient¼�0.53 [�0.66 to �0.40], P<0.001) viewing the data. Conclusions Storing more detailed electronic health data was generally preferred, but respondents were averse to wider access to and sharing of this information. When developing frameworks for the use of electronic health data, policy makers should consider approaches that both highlight the benefits to the individual and minimize the perception of privacy risks.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Geography and Planning (GEOPL)
Subjects: R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
Z Bibliography. Library Science. Information Resources > ZA Information resources > ZA4450 Databases
Uncontrolled Keywords: Health records, data privacy, stated preference, personal data, public preferences, attitudes
Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group Limited
ISSN: 1067-5027
Date of First Compliant Deposit: 30 March 2016
Date of Acceptance: 16 January 2016
Last Modified: 07 Nov 2019 09:02
URI: http://orca.cf.ac.uk/id/eprint/85445

Citation Data

Cited 10 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics