Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Knowledge acquisition and research evidence in autism: researcher and practitioner perspectives and engagement

Carrington, Sarah J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5548-8793, Uljarevic, Mirko, Roberts, Alessandra, White, Louise J., Morgan, Lynda, Wimpory, Dawn, Ramsden, Christopher and Leekam, Susan R. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1122-0135 2016. Knowledge acquisition and research evidence in autism: researcher and practitioner perspectives and engagement. Research in Developmental Disabilities 51-52 , pp. 126-134. 10.1016/j.ridd.2016.01.011

[thumbnail of published_pdf.pdf]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (831kB) | Preview

Abstract

Background Government policy and national practice guidelines have created an increasing need for autism services to adopt an evidence-based practice approach. However, a gap continues to exist between research evidence and its application. This study investigated the difference between autism researchers and practitioners in their methods of acquiring knowledge. Methods In a questionnaire study, 261 practitioners and 422 researchers reported on the methods they use and perceive to be beneficial for increasing research access and knowledge. They also reported on their level of engagement with members of the other professional community. Results Researchers and practitioners reported different methods used to access information. Each group, however, had similar overall priorities regarding access to research information. While researchers endorsed the use of academic journals significantly more often than practitioners, both groups included academic journals in their top three choices. The groups differed in the levels of engagement they reported; researchers indicated they were more engaged with practitioners than vice versa. Conclusions Comparison of researcher and practitioner preferences led to several recommendations to improve knowledge sharing and translation, including enhancing access to original research publications, facilitating informal networking opportunities and the development of proposals for the inclusion of practitioners throughout the research process.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Psychology
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Publisher: Elsevier
ISSN: 0891-4222
Funders: Economic and Social Research Council
Date of First Compliant Deposit: 30 March 2016
Date of Acceptance: 17 January 2016
Last Modified: 04 May 2023 19:50
URI: https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/86426

Citation Data

Cited 9 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics