Model simulations of flood and debris flow timing in steep catchments after wildfire

Rengers, F. K., McGuire, L. A., Kean, J. W., Staley, D. M. and Hobley, D. E. J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2371-0534 2016. Model simulations of flood and debris flow timing in steep catchments after wildfire. Water Resources Research 52 (8) , pp. 6041-6061. 10.1002/2015WR018176

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Debris flows are a typical hazard on steep slopes after wildfire, but unlike debris flows that mobilize from landslides, most postwildfire debris flows are generated from water runoff. The majority of existing debris flow modeling has focused on landslide-triggered debris flows. In this study we explore the potential for using process-based rainfall-runoff models to simulate the timing of water flow and runoff-generated debris flows in recently burned areas. Two different spatially distributed hydrologic models with differing levels of complexity were used: the full shallow water equations and the kinematic wave approximation. Model parameter values were calibrated in two different watersheds, spanning two orders of magnitude in drainage area. These watersheds were affected by the 2009 Station Fire in the San Gabriel Mountains, CA, USA. Input data for the numerical models were constrained by time series of soil moisture, flow stage, and rainfall collected at field sites, as well as high-resolution lidar-derived digital elevation models. The calibrated parameters were used to model a third watershed in the burn area, and the results show a good match with observed timing of flow peaks. The calibrated roughness parameter (Manning's n) was generally higher when using the kinematic wave approximation relative to the shallow water equations, and decreased with increasing spatial scale. The calibrated effective watershed hydraulic conductivity was low for both models, even for storms occurring several months after the fire, suggesting that wildfire-induced changes to soil-water infiltration were retained throughout that time. Overall, the two model simulations were quite similar suggesting that a kinematic wave model, which is simpler and more computationally efficient, is a suitable approach for predicting flood and debris flow timing in steep, burned watersheds.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Earth and Environmental Sciences
Subjects:	Q Science > Q Science (General)
Uncontrolled Keywords:	wildfire; numerical modeling; flood
Publisher:	American Geophysical Union (AGU)
ISSN:	0043-1397
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	25 October 2016
Date of Acceptance:	13 July 2016
Last Modified:	01 Nov 2022 11:37
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/95596

Citation Data

Cited 73 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item