ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff
Browse by Current Cardiff authors
 | Up a level |
Number of items: 33.
|
Shackel, Nicholas and Rowbottom, Darrell P.
2020.
Bertrand's paradox and the maximum entropy principle.
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
101
(3)
, pp. 505-523.
10.1111/phpr.12596
Item availability restricted. |
|
| Shackel, Nicholas, Farias, Miguel and Kahane, Guy 2019. The scientific study of belief and pain modulation: conceptual problems. Spirituality, Religion and Health: From Research to Clinical Practice, Springer, |
|
Shackel, Nicholas
2018.
The infinity from nothing paradox and the immovable object meets the irresistible force.
European Journal for Philosophy of Science
8
, pp. 417-433.
10.1007/s13194-017-0192-2
|
|
|
Shackel, Nicholas
2018.
Scope or focus? Normative focus and the metaphysics of normative relations.
Journal of Philosophy
115
(6)
, pp. 281-312.
10.5840/jphil2018115619
|
|
|
|
Shackel, Nicholas
2018.
A simple theory containing its own truth predicate.
South American Journal of Logic
4
(1)
, pp. 121-131.
|
|
|
| Shackel, Nicholas 2016. Freedom of speech. In: ten Have, Henk ed. Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics, Berlin: Springer, pp. 1305-1309. (10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0_201) |
|
|
| Shackel, Nicholas, Farias, Miguel and Kahane, Guy 2016. Conceptual problems in the scientific study of belief. In: Jaeger, Christoph ed. Brain - Religion - Experience: Multidiscipline Encounters, Dordrecht and New York: Springer, |
|
|
|
Shackel, Nicholas
2015.
The normativity of rationality.
Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy
34
(2)
, pp. 167-189.
|
|
|
| Shackel, Nicholas 2014. A problem for the unity of normativity. Analysis 74 (3) , pp. 404-411. 10.1093/analys/anu063 |
|
|
| Shackel, Nicholas 2014. The nought belief paradox. Erkenntnis 79 (3) , pp. 523-529. 10.1007/s10670-013-9521-9 |
|
|
| Shackel, Nicholas 2014. Still waiting for a plausible Humean theory of reasons. Philosophical Studies 167 (3) , pp. 607-633. 10.1007/s11098-013-0117-7 |
|
|
| Shackel, Nicholas 2013. Pseudoscience and idiosyncratic theories of rational belief. In: Pigliucci, Massimo and Boudry, Maarten eds. The Philosophy of Pseudoscience, Chicago: Chicago University Press, pp. 417-438. |
|
|
| Shackel, Nicholas 2013. The fragility of freedom of speech. Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (5) , p. 316. 10.1136/medethics-2012-100628 |
|
|
| Wiech, Katja, Kahane, Guy, Shackel, Nicholas, Farias, Miguel, Savulescu, Julian and Tracey, Irene 2013. Cold or calculating? Reduced activity in the subgenual cingulate cortex reflects decreased emotional aversion to harming in counterintuitive utilitarian judgment. Cognition 126 (3) , pp. 364-372. 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.002 |
|
|
| Kahane, Guy, Wiech, Katja, Shackel, Nicholas, Farias, Miguel, Savulescu, Julian and Tracey, Irene 2012. The neural basis of intuitive and counterintuitive moral judgment. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 7 (4) , pp. 393-402. 10.1093/scan/nsr005 |
|
|
| Shackel, Nicholas 2011. Explaining variation in knowledge by full belief. Proceedings of the 34th Ludwig Wittgenstein Symposium, Austria, August 2011, Ontos Verlag: Wittgenstein Symposium, pp. 95-102. |
|
|
| Shackel, Nicholas 2011. The world as a graph: Defending graphical structuralism. Analysis 71 (1) , pp. 10-21. 10.1093/analys/anq118 |
|
|
| Kahane, Guy and Shackel, Nicholas 2010. Methodological issues in the neuroscience of moral judgement. Mind and Language 25 (5) , pp. 561-582. 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01401.x |
|
|
| Shackel, Nicholas 2010. Sophism and pragmatism. Logique et Analyse 53 (210) , pp. 131-149. |
|
|
| Rowbottom, Darrell P. and Shackel, Nicholas 2010. Bangu’s random thoughts on Bertrand’s Paradox. Analysis 70 (4) , pp. 689-692. 10.1093/analys/anq080 |
|
|
| Kahane, Guy and Shackel, Nicholas. 2008. Do abnormal responses show utilitarian bias? Nature 452 (7185) , E5-E5. 10.1038/nature06785 |
|
|
| Shackel, Nicholas 2008. Paradoxes of probability. In: Rudas, Tamás ed. Handbook of Probability : Theory and Applications, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, pp. 49-66. |
|
|
| Shackel, Nicholas 2008. Coherentism and the symmetry of epistemic support. Analysis 68 (299) , pp. 226-234. 10.1111/j.1467-8284.2008.00743.x |
|
|
| Wiech, K., Farias, M., Kahane, G, Shackel, Nicholas, Tiede, W and Tracey, I 2008. An fMRI study measuring analgesia enhanced by religion as a belief system. Pain 139 (2) , pp. 467-476. |
|
|
| Shackel, Nicholas 2007. Parting smoothly? Analysis 67 (296) , pp. 321-324. 10.1111/j.1467-8284.2007.00700.x |
|
|
| Shackel, Nicholas 2007. Bertrand's Paradox and the principle of indifference. Philosophy of Science 74 (2) , pp. 150-175. 10.1086/519028 |
|
|
| Shackel, Nicholas 2006. Shutting Dretske's door. Erkenntnis 64 (3) , pp. 393-401. 10.1007/s10670-006-9002-5 |
|
|
| Clark, Michael and Shackel, Nicholas 2006. The Dr. Psycho paradox and Newcomb's problem. Erkenntnis 64 (1) , pp. 85-100. 10.1007/s10670-005-7515-y |
|
|
| Shackel, Nicholas 2005. The form of the Benardete Dichotomy. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (2) , pp. 397-417. 10.1093/bjps/axi121 |
|
|
| Shackel, Nicholas 2005. The vacuity of postmodernist methodology. Metaphilosophy 36 (3) , pp. 295-320. 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2005.00370.x |
|
|
| Shackel, Nicholas 2003. D Gillies, Philosophical theories of probability [Book Review]. Philosophical Books 44 (1) , pp. 92-95. 10.1111/1468-0149.00290 |
|
|
| Clark, Michael and Shackel, Nicholas 2003. Decision theory, symmetry and causal structure: Reply to Meacham and Weisberg. Mind 112 (448) , pp. 691-701. 10.1093/mind/112.448.691 |
|
|
| Clark, Michael and Shackel, Nicholas 2000. The two-envelope paradox. Mind 109 (435) , pp. 415-442. 10.1093/mind/109.435.415 |
|
|
Cardiff University Information Services