Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

The politics of deceptive borders: 'biomarkers of deceit' and the case of iBorderCtrl

Sanchez-Monedero, Javier ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8649-1709 and Dencik, Lina ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1982-0901 2022. The politics of deceptive borders: 'biomarkers of deceit' and the case of iBorderCtrl. Information, Communication and Society 25 (3) , pp. 413-430. 10.1080/1369118X.2020.1792530

[thumbnail of 1369118X.2020.pdf]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

This paper critically examines a recently developed proposal for a border control system called iBorderCtrl, designed to detect deception based on facial recognition technology and the measurement of micro-expressions, termed ‘biomarkers of deceit’. Funded under the European Commission’s Horizon 2020 programme, we situate our analysis in the wider political economy of ‘emotional AI’ and the history of deception detection technologies. We then move on to interrogate the design of iBorderCtrl using publicly available documents and assess the assumptions and scientific validation underpinning the project design. Finally, drawing on a Bayesian analysis we outline statistical fallacies in the foundational premise of mass screening and argue that it is very unlikely that the model that iBorderCtrl provides for deception detection would work in practice. By interrogating actual systems in this way, we argue that we can begin to question the very premise of the development of data-driven systems, and emotional AI and deception detection in particular, pushing back on the assumption that these systems are fulfilling the tasks they claim to be attending to and instead ask what function such projects carry out in the creation of subjects and management of populations. This function is not merely technical but, rather, we argue, distinctly political and forms part of a mode of governance increasingly shaping life opportunities and fundamental rights.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Journalism, Media and Culture
Additional Information: This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
ISSN: 1369-118X
Date of First Compliant Deposit: 3 July 2020
Date of Acceptance: 22 June 2020
Last Modified: 02 May 2023 17:38
URI: https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/132993

Citation Data

Cited 10 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics